<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>A Solitary Conspiracy &#187; Obama</title>
	<atom:link href="http://solitaryconspiracy.com/category/obama/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://solitaryconspiracy.com</link>
	<description>Commentary &#38; analysis from a conservative American in Europe</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 18:05:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Health Bill Prices Slashed! Now only $871B! What a deal!</title>
		<link>http://solitaryconspiracy.com/2009/10/21/health-bill-prices-slashed-now-only-871b-what-a-deal/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://solitaryconspiracy.com/2009/10/21/health-bill-prices-slashed-now-only-871b-what-a-deal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 09:05:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>solitaryconspiracy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://solitaryconspiracy.com/?p=1535</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You can pay more but you can't buy less. Speaker Pelosi's pleasure at reducing projected health care bill costs is misguided.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://solitaryconspiracy.com/2009/10/21/health-bill-prices-slashed-now-only-871b-what-a-deal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An Irish &#8220;Yes&#8221; and US Implications</title>
		<link>http://solitaryconspiracy.com/2009/10/05/an-irish-yes-and-us-implications/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://solitaryconspiracy.com/2009/10/05/an-irish-yes-and-us-implications/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 12:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>solitaryconspiracy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[EU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://solitaryconspiracy.com/?p=1401</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[



In the wake of the overwhelming Irish &#8220;yes&#8221; vote to the Lisbon treaty, some things seem almost certain: Poland will sign the treaty; the Czech Republic will be pressured to adopt it; Tony Blair may1 become &#8220;EU president&#8221;; an EU &#8220;Secretary of State&#8221; will be named; and there will be new impetus to add Turkey [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://solitaryconspiracy.com/2009/10/05/an-irish-yes-and-us-implications/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Promising Start, but Many Questions Remain</title>
		<link>http://solitaryconspiracy.com/2009/10/02/a-promising-start-but-many-questions-remain/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://solitaryconspiracy.com/2009/10/02/a-promising-start-but-many-questions-remain/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 09:08:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>solitaryconspiracy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[EU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Venezuela]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://solitaryconspiracy.com/?p=1380</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[



The 1 October 2009 meeting in Geneva between the so-called E3+3 (Britain, France, Germany, the US, Russia and China) and representatives of &#8220;Mahmoud and the Mullahs&#8221; was a not-so-surprising initial success. The Iranian leadership knows it&#8217;s being backed into a corner following the disclosure of the under-construction Qom enrichment facility. The only hope for them [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://solitaryconspiracy.com/2009/10/02/a-promising-start-but-many-questions-remain/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Even the French think Obama is a wimp</title>
		<link>http://solitaryconspiracy.com/2009/09/30/even-the-french-think-obama-is-a-wimp/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://solitaryconspiracy.com/2009/09/30/even-the-french-think-obama-is-a-wimp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 12:31:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>solitaryconspiracy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://solitaryconspiracy.com/?p=1335</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The American view that the French are wimps is ugly and undeserved but widely held, so French President Sarkozy&#8217;s statement implying that President Obama is one gets our attention. Apparently Obama didn&#8217;t want Sarkozy to upstage him at the UN in September. The result:

Sarkozy was so annoyed with Obama’s weak-kneed approach that he reportedly told [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://solitaryconspiracy.com/2009/09/30/even-the-french-think-obama-is-a-wimp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama snubs Brown at UN. No more &#8220;special relationship&#8221;?</title>
		<link>http://solitaryconspiracy.com/2009/09/24/obama-snubs-brown-at-un-no-more-special-relationship/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://solitaryconspiracy.com/2009/09/24/obama-snubs-brown-at-un-no-more-special-relationship/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 10:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>solitaryconspiracy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[EU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[downing street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://solitaryconspiracy.com/?p=1207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#8217;d think that President Obama could spare a few minutes for a formal meeting with the leader of one of our oldest and most important allies while both are in town on business. Not so. According to the BBC:
The prime minister&#8217;s team were &#8220;frantic&#8221; after being unable to secure the talks at the UN summit [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://solitaryconspiracy.com/2009/09/24/obama-snubs-brown-at-un-no-more-special-relationship/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Obama Outsourcing US Foreign Policy?</title>
		<link>http://solitaryconspiracy.com/2009/09/17/is-obama-outsourcing-us-foreign-policy/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://solitaryconspiracy.com/2009/09/17/is-obama-outsourcing-us-foreign-policy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 15:26:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>solitaryconspiracy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Venezuela]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://solitaryconspiracy.com/?p=1101</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[



Is President Obama unintentionally outsourcing US foreign policy?
A pattern emerging from recent events suggests so. Up first, of course, is the plan to scrap the US Missile Defense shield in Eastern Europe, a long-time thorn in the side of many European and US Liberals, not to mention Vladimir Putin. By putting the planned system on [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://solitaryconspiracy.com/2009/09/17/is-obama-outsourcing-us-foreign-policy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pelosi Tells the White House to Go Pound Sand</title>
		<link>http://solitaryconspiracy.com/2009/09/03/pelosi-tells-the-white-house-to-go-pound-sand/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://solitaryconspiracy.com/2009/09/03/pelosi-tells-the-white-house-to-go-pound-sand/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 11:52:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>solitaryconspiracy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[members of congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speaker of the house]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[white house]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://solitaryconspiracy.com/?p=911</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But is she really putting her speakership at risk, as Redstate&#8217;s post  Speaker Pelosi Stands Firm on the Public Option, Essentially Tells the White House to Go Pound Sand asserts?
That moment in The Great Obamacare War arrived yesterday, when the Speaker of the House stood firm on the public option, essentially telling the White [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://solitaryconspiracy.com/2009/09/03/pelosi-tells-the-white-house-to-go-pound-sand/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BBC: Barack Broadcasting Corporation?</title>
		<link>http://solitaryconspiracy.com/2009/09/03/bbc-obama-apologists/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://solitaryconspiracy.com/2009/09/03/bbc-obama-apologists/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 07:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>solitaryconspiracy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[approval ratings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stimulus bill]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://solitaryconspiracy.com/?p=867</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Matt Frei&#8217;s commentary on the BBC News website, titled Washington diary: Obama&#8217;s slump, is so full of BS I don&#8217;t even know where to begin. Granted, it&#8217;s an opinion piece, but millions of people around the world watch or listen to BBC News every day, and the line between reporting opinions and facts is increasingly [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://solitaryconspiracy.com/2009/09/03/bbc-obama-apologists/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Single-Term Obama Presidency? Maybe, Maybe Not.</title>
		<link>http://solitaryconspiracy.com/2009/09/01/a-single-term-obama-presidency-maybe-maybe-not/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://solitaryconspiracy.com/2009/09/01/a-single-term-obama-presidency-maybe-maybe-not/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 12:38:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>solitaryconspiracy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://solitaryconspiracy.com/?p=835</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Will Obama be impeached or forced to resign before the 2012 elections? Howard Portnoy&#8217;s post in Hot Air, titled Can Obama Save His Presidency? suggests just that:
The fate of the Obama presidency is, I believe, a fait accompli. The question now is not how it will end — but when. I for one am growing [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://solitaryconspiracy.com/2009/09/01/a-single-term-obama-presidency-maybe-maybe-not/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Congress, Polling, and Two Trends</title>
		<link>http://solitaryconspiracy.com/2009/08/31/congress-polling-and-two-trends/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://solitaryconspiracy.com/2009/08/31/congress-polling-and-two-trends/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 11:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>solitaryconspiracy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[approval ratings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[members of congress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://solitaryconspiracy.com/?p=810</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The nonsurprising factoid in the latest Rassmussen poll is that 57% Would Like to Replace Entire Congress. In addition to the headline two interesting trends are highlighted in the release.
First trend- Increasingly partisan approval ratings.
&#8230;the number of Democrats who would vote to keep the entire Congress has grown from 25% last fall to 43% today. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://solitaryconspiracy.com/2009/08/31/congress-polling-and-two-trends/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
